Blog For Free!
Archives
Home
2006 August
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
My Links
BioInformatics
Artificial Intelligence
3D DNA
Satlites
NASA Satelite
Science News
Computer news
all over the place computer news
Planetary Protection
Alien organisms Protocol
Einstein Gravity Probe
science projects
Phrack
News that matters (believe it)
CDC l33t
Revolutionary learning software for kids :) (From one of the fathers of modern day computers) :)
Classical Conditioning
cool ska music
tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images
Sponsored
Blog
|
| Future tech: Ghost in the shell or we're the some of parts |
| 04.30.04 (5:48 pm) [edit] |
I sometimes wonder where technology will lead us.
But then I think, I'll tell you :P . Technology will lead us to a point where we take our ships and dematerialize them into a string of particles that travel through a black hole and re-assemble on the other side. That would be true exploration. If some how, quantum entaglement could be used more effectively. I know at this point cryptographic messages can utilize quantum entaglement to ensure "secure" message transfer. I'm still studying to see if quantum entaglement could figure out the ghost in the shell phenomenon where: is the mind seperate from our body or as we deconstruct the mind and put it back together, does a person become lost over time. ?
It's quite a pickle. (<==Stolen quote from the Matrix: Reloaded) 8P>
|
|
|
| |
| idiots R US |
| 04.28.04 (6:27 pm) [edit] |
Hey. Um. Like. I just don't know what to say. I spend my day studying Calulus and writing for fun my site, (you should check it out by the way www.mlwaukeeevent.com) all day and you know. The idiots are hiding in the library books.
I reach for a library book title Java 2 programming, I hold the book in my hand, I open the cover, then look down into the pages and then I notice something out the corner of my I. Sitting in between the shelfs is an idiot with his head level with the book I just grabbed. WHOA. I jump back startled. I go, "Heeeellllloooo, aaaarrrreee yooooou okkkaaaay?," really slowly. He just smiles and says, "Yeah, I'm just a blithering idiot and this is just what I do." He continues and says, "By nature, I think of the most dumbest useless crap that couldn't even benefit myself and engage in the task purely in the name of being the stupidest I can be."
I pause for a send, thinking intently. Then, I pose a question, "Why?" He thinks for a split second (or at least I think what he did counted as thinking) and says, "It's in my nature." I ask the idiot, "what do you know of nature." The idiot simply replies, "That's just what I was told." I ponder several other questions but then I begin to feel my life force being drained from my body and assume that he can harness the power of the idiot vortex and split the scene.
Point. There's no point. Don't waste time with an idiot.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 intelligence agency for domestic spying; oh boy :} |
| 04.13.04 (4:07 am) [edit] |
Hey, I'm all for better protection. Geez. Personally, I kinda like a government camera in my bathroom when I go take a whiz; however, I thought we already had the department of Homeland Defense. I'm kinda like cofused. So now, we need another intelligence agency. And, on top of that, take away the ability for the FBI to monitor other intelligence agencies by taking away their intelligence branch? It's really confusing me.
Hey call me slow to understand the structures of secret government protection because by their nature, and the fact that their doing a pretty good job at keeping secret, means that they're doing a good job at making sure I don't know much about them. But this just equates to me as this agency + this agency + this agency + this agnecy == 'a whole lof of agencies looking in my bathroom.'
There's also the problem of one person being able to get the data. Yes that's right, the data from the database. So, who get's the data equivalent to pretty much all the agencies combined? I'm no law expert but I do know data. If we switch all of the satelites currently monitoring the rest of the world and those that look into other galaxies, and start pointing all of them at my house, I would get kinda nervous. And hey, anybody realize that the war can one day end? So how do we remove these new jaugernaut organizations and telephone book size laws we're tacking on to the Constitution after this war on terror is over. I predict it will end, so, just like we created the DEA, its existence depends on there being a lot of drugs being made illegal. If drugs weren't illegal, they would have to go after illegal prescription medication abusers. Oh joy. When terroism is greatly reduced to non-existance, who do these domestic spy agencies with close to omnipotent powers go after? Hey, stop staring at me.
Okay, you get my point. I kinda like my freedom to roam around the city, even though no matter what store I go to there are like thousands of cameras all through the mall taking free photographs of me and not giving cash or royalties for gathering survey information. Next RFID tags to figure out what page I'm on when reading my latest novel.
I just want to give my 2 cents as to what's going on in politics even though I don't have time to study everything. Still, I feel kinda quirky about things and nobody will know how you feel about things unless they get some idea from an average person on how to make it better.
|
|
|
| |
| privacy, 1984 style |
| 04.12.04 (7:31 am) [edit] |
Corporations may fear hackers not necessarily for the damage they cause but for the damage that they prevent. Hackers look for holes in privacy that shouldn't exist and for the most part, alert corporations to the holes so that malicious parties don't get at supposed "private" data.
I think corporations really are confused as to when they sale their supposed private data to third parties, it leaves people wondering, "How exactly are these corporations protecting my 'private' data." It's more embarrassing than actual "criminal" activity. It shows that corporations "aren't" protecting private data; otherwise, with the money they make, it should be next to impossible to access individual data.
So, "what's in your wallet?"
|
|
|
| |
| Reality Testing: An analytical approach (Maybe :P) |
| 04.07.04 (3:22 pm) [edit] |
Work exist to provide a means towards existance and to improve our daily lives. We move forward and strive. We succeed and we sometimes fail. But it's the expirence we learn from. We choose to do many things but does it improve us? Cause and effect is the relationship. We work we prosper and get better things and life improves. When the nature of work changes and the technology changes faster then we can keep up with, how to we invent something in order to keep up with the changing technology?
Secondly, where is the technolgy headed. I say the stars. We'll eventually approach a population where travel to and fro will be as common as taking the bus to work.
How does the relate to work? Okay, we strive we work to achieve further technology in which after a finite amount of time we'll achieve a society will entail traveling to planets in the same way we take a bus to work.
Is that reality. Is that realistic? Yeah, ... but what reality you believe in determines what reality becomes.
|
|
|
| |
|
 Talk in my flooble chatterbox!
|
