Technobable of A Super Elite Geek


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2006 August
2006 May
2006 April
2006 March
2006 February
2006 January
2005 December
2005 November
2005 October
2005 September
2005 July
2005 June
2005 May
2005 April
2005 March
2005 February
2005 January
2004 December
2004 November
2004 October
2004 September
2004 August
2004 July
2004 June
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January

My Links
BioInformatics
Artificial Intelligence

3D DNA
Satlites
NASA Satelite
Science News
Computer news
all over the place computer news
Planetary Protection
Alien organisms Protocol
Einstein Gravity Probe
science projects
Phrack
News that matters (believe it)
CDC l33t
Revolutionary learning software for kids :) (From one of the fathers of modern day computers) :)
Classical Conditioning
cool ska music

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



Interesting site describing an NBC interview
03.22.06 (7:26 am)   [edit]
aim media monitor link 
 
Support President Bush!
03.20.06 (7:51 am)   [edit]

I strongly support President Bush. He has to bear the burden of working on delivering on what the Democrats and the Reuplicans wanted.

When the war first began, I saw barely any desenting views opposing the war. But what I also knew was that the war would take time and anyone with something to gain "contractors, old debts owed, ..." would try with all their might to make the US look bad.

I knew, just like any conflict that the United States engages in for longer then a year or so would be, in the end, met by Americas laziness to finish what it started. America has a history of engaging in something and leaving it half done.

Americans believe that everything works like McDonalds. They believe we have an "easy" button and the war begins and stops just by pressing some button. But the world doesn't operate that way. When you start a venture, you have to work practically 12 hour days just to keep it running. I believe most businesses fail in the first 7 years or so. In this case, the Unites States engaged in the business of starting an entire country from scratch. This means, helping to start numerous businesses. And it didn't stop there. The US helped political parties. Helped to build an entire military from scratch.

I could continue to a cresendo, but what's the point.

Let's just say that what's being engaged in is unprecedented and stops nothing short of extrodinary. What will be the result of a strong and stable Iraq that people fear. Here's the fear. The fear is that the US will support Iraq and just like any country the US has supported, that country has the option to look for a different ally down that road; however, the result of this current plan will mean that Iraq has access to some of the most technologically advanced equipment the US has to offer. Something that startling would make it easy to see how even a country like Isreal would become nervous.

Imagine that, an arab country with the same capabilities as the United States ...

Anyone with any common sense knows that 2 things are occuring. An election is scheduled for 2008 and the media is losing money. One side is a democratic party desperate for power and the other side is a media, desperate for money. If things do not go bad for the Republicans, the newspapers will not have any stories people want to read and the Democrats will never have a chance at the 2008 elections. Right now, everything is pretty bad for the Democrats and the media. So the Democrats are trying the best move they can come up with. Some yuckle from cow tipping country Wisconsin shouts, "Hey, let's censor the president." Right away, you begin to see the desperation is totally complete. And the media, jumps all over it.

I remember there used to be areas in Iraq where businesses couldn't open and streets were undrivable. Now all of that has changed. Businesses are florishing and 90% of all street are open throughout Iraq. The bombings are occuring but those bombs, like the media and the Democratic party, are the bombs of desperation.

The people who do not support a stable Iraq are: 1 US enenmies. 3. Iraq enemnies. 2. People who have a financial gain for an unstable Iraq.

I say, support the President even though the media wants you to believe otherwise. Your television has other stations so don't watch news station whose entire budget comes from getting you to watch the news. Also, just like your imaginary, everything is "easy" button, your television has a volume control button. When people are saying something you don't agree with, turn down the volume, make up kind words in your head and turn up the volume when you see someone nice on the television you agree with and want to rally behind. C'mon, get up off that couch, you can do it! If you are in a crowd and the crowd seems to act as if you're "forced" to go along with their opinion, there is always a public restroom and the call of nature during the "guys ranting of hows everything is bad with the world" melts away and disolves into the oblivion.

Anyway, I totally support the way the war is going and I totally support the way the country is being ran. A good question then would be to ask is, well, what do I not support. Ok. What I do not support is how difficult it is to figure out what to properly invest in that will give the greatest return on investment. The best thing to invest in for a minute was cell phones (communication), defense contractors and oil. I also don't support over-fishing.  I hope the people who fish are forced to set up farms in the ocean where the only fish they get are the fish that are in the farms. 

Well, that's it for now. ;)

 

Energizer bunny 

                              /\                /\      
/ \ / \
| @ \ / @ |
| @@ \ / @@ |
\ @@ \ / @@@ /
\ @@@ \ / @@@ /
\ @@@ \ / @@@ /
\ @@ \__/ @@ /
\ _ _ /
/ / \ / \ \
/ o o \
| * |
__ | _____ |
/ \ \ / \ /
_____\__/___ \ /
_/ \\ \__ \__________/
__/ \\ \_ / __ \
_/ _______ \\ __ \_ / _/ \ \
/ | ____| -/ \___\ /__/ | \
| | |__ \_______|_______/ \
| | __| | ______ \
\_ | |____ / _/ \_ |
\_ |_____| / _/ \_ | __
\__ _____________/__/ \ |/ \
\__/ | |\__/
\________________________ _______/__/
 

 
internet entrapment
03.15.06 (2:41 pm)   [edit]
I sometimes think the internet was designed as a better way to not just spy on citizens domestically but citizens abroad. Most communications are now taking place over the internet and tapping the internet isn't considered wiretapping. The federal government is asking google to give up records to "make everyone safe." Here's what I think. I think someone wants to freely see whatever you're doing no matter what you're doing, all the time. And don't want to ask before the do it. Consider this, all banks are online so if they ask for your passwords to your bank account, it would be considered totally legal. AT&T is getting back together to become itself again and your phone calls are being routed right through it through VOIP. I don't think you even need a court order. What does it all means, you know, access to anyones information, anytime you want it? I really can't answer that question just yet, I guess will give it a few years ...
 
internet entrapment
03.15.06 (2:41 pm)   [edit]
I sometimes think the internet was designed as a better way to not just spy on citizens domestically but citizens abroad. Most communications are now taking place over the internet and tapping the internet isn't considered wiretapping. The federal government is asking google to give up records to "make everyone safe." Here's what I think. I think someone wants to freely see whatever you're doing no matter what you're doing, all the time. And don't want to ask before the do it. Consider this, all banks are online so if they ask for your passwords to your bank account, it would be considered totally legal. AT&T is getting back together to become itself again and your phone calls are being routed right through it through VOIP. I don't think you even need a court order. What does it all means, you know, access to anyones information, anytime you want it? I really can't answer that question just yet, I guess will give it a few years ...
 
Lack of innovation in many industries, well except japan
03.08.06 (7:11 am)   [edit]
innovation (n) 3: the act of starting something for the first time; introducing something new. The problem with gm gmc anc and a bunch of other american car industries is they come out with the same internal combustion engine year after year after year. Most people know the the American auto industry (and a few other auto industries) exists for the sheer purpose of producing muscle cars the have bells and whistles but do not mean much to the consumer except higher prices and more money to shell out just to maintain the vehicle. The Japanese auto industry seems to have a different model in mind. I guess they figure the best way to beat all of the competition is to produce cars that don't break, look pleasing to the eye and saves the consumer a ton of money in the long run. Toyota came out with the Prius hybrid on a sheer risk with the idea of saving the environment, getting to the market first and producing a high quality vehicle with the customer in mind. It paid off and it signaled to the consumer that car companies can still innovate. Thanks to the Prius, maybe one day people can hook up more electronic devices to their car and the car can evolve into more then your grand fathers automobile.
 
Talk in my flooble chatterbox!